Skip to Main Content

PSC 500: Evaluating Resources

This guide is for PSC 500 classes.

Why Evaluate a Resource?

Before you use a resource in your research, you should evaluate the resource's quality and appropriateness for your assignment.

Not all journal articles are of the same quality. Some articles include concerning research practices. The people studied might be only a small population, the numbers might not add up correctly, or the conclusion may be making a big guess based on little evidence.

Also, it is important to note if a resource is a primary resource or a secondary resource.

Why Care About Peer-review?

Peer-reviewed articles (also known as "refereed articles") have gone through the peer review process prior to publication.

In the peer review process, the author's expert peers evaluate the quality of the article and the article's research. Very often, the author(s) will have to revise their articles and make changes before resubmitting. The publisher publishes the article only after the article has been approved by the expert reviewers.

If an article is peer-reviewed, you can be more confident in the article's quality.

How Can I Tell if an Article is Peer-Reviewed?

There are a few different ways to check if an article is peer-reviewed. Each journal may represent the peer-review process differently.

If you search for articles in a database like Academic Search Complete, you might have the option to filter to show only peer-reviewed articles. In Academic Search Complete, this option is in the Advanced Search screen. There is a checkbox to filter to show only peer-reviewed items.

If you use a different database, or no database at all, to find articles, you will have to do the investigating yourself.

Some publisher website layouts will have peer-review process timestamps like this:

Screenshot of a Publication History timeline with dates for the peer-review process.

Sometimes, only the article's PDF will have these timestamps.

What Kind of Article did I Find?

You have searched a database (or Google Scholar) and have found an article about your topic! It has great keywords, and the abstract is interesting. Before you use the article in your research paper, pause and check:

What kind of article did I find?

The same journal can publish different types of articles. These article types might not all go through peer review (be refereed). Not all article types will be appropriate for your research. The type of article should be listed by the journal, but it isn't always. Article types can include book review, editorial, opinion piece, case study, research article...

Not all publishers label their article types! Be on the lookout to check what type of article you have accessed!

Look at different article types with me in this Article Types Video.

Book Review

Book reviews are written to help people decided if they are interested in reading a book. Book reviews are usually not peer-reviewed. They do not include research. Book reviews are likely never a good resource choice when researching a topic.

Book Review Example. You can identify a book review by its common elements:

  • Book reviews often start with a citation of the book being reviewed. This might include a price.
  • Book reviews are usually short.
  • Book reviews focus on the quality of one book.
  • Book reviews do not include original research.

Editorial

Editorials are written by the editors of an entire journal or a specific journal issue. Editorials are usually not peer-reviewed. They do not include research. Editorials are not likely to be a good research choice.

Editorial Example. You can identify an editorial by its common elements:

  • Editorials may be labeled as an editorial on the publisher's website.
  • Editorials may be long or short.
  • Editorials focus on the journal, journal issue, or another article published in the journal.
  • Editorials are written by editors.
  • Editorials do not include original research.

Opinion

Opinion pieces are written by anyone. Opinion pieces are usually not peer-reviewed, but they may have been reviewed by an editor before publication. This is not as rigorous as peer-review. Opinion pieces are not likely to be a good research choice, unless you are researching something like a discipline's attitude towards a subject.

Opinion Example. You can identify an opinion piece by its common elements:

  • Opinion pieces may be labeled as "Opinion" or "Commentary" on the publisher's page.
  • Opinion pieces may be long or short.
  • Opinion pieces focus on a topic adjacent to actual research. They might discuss another published article, a community's attitude towards a research topic, or questions about a discipline practice.
  • Opinion pieces likely have a references list and in-text citations.
  • Opinion pieces should not include original research.

 

Evaluating Websites

Sometimes, it is appropriate to use websites as resources for research projects. Always evaluate a website for usefulness, accuracy, and trustworthiness before using the website as a reference. Even when using a website for personal research, always evaluate the likely accuracy of the content. This will help you avoid misinformation or disinformation.

You can evaluate a website by some criteria. You can use these criteria to form an impression of a website. If the website fails any of these criteria, it doesn't automatically make the website a "bad source":

  • Purpose & Audience
    • Who is the site designed for?
    • Is the site scholarly or popular?
    • Are there advertisements on the site?
    • What is the overall purpose of the site?
  • Authority & Credibility
    • Can the author of the site be identified? (Is the "author" an organization?)
    • Can the author be contacted? Is there any contact information?
    • What are the author's qualifications? Do their qualifications show expertise on the subject?
    • Is the site affiliated with a particular organization?
    • What is the domain of the site (.edu, .gov, .org, .com)? 
  • Accuracy & Reliability
    • Does the site appear to be well-researched?
    • Are there references supporting the site's statements or viewpoints? How well do the references relate to the site's claims? Are the references high-quality themselves?
    • Is it easy to tell which references support which claims?
    • Does the site include grammatical, spelling, or typographical errors?
    • How does the site compare to library resources available on the topic?
  • Currency & Timeliness
    • When was this information on the website published?
    • Does the page indicate when it was most recently updated?
    • Are there dead links on the page?
  • Objectivity or Bias
    • Does the site present many opinions or just one?
    • Does the site present opinions or facts?
    • What biases can you identify?
    • Is the site sponsored by a company or organization?
    • If there are advertisements, are they easy to distinguish from the informational content?
  • Structure & Navigation
    • Is the site well organized? Can you tell what content goes together?
    • Is it easy to navigate between different pages on the site?
    • Does the site have a search box?

Finally, ask yourself these questions:

  • Is this site a reliable, well-documented information source provided by a reputable author or organization?
  • Would this be a good source of information for my assignment?